British Petroleum and The Delay of Maintenance Case Analysis

British fossil crude oil color, advanced absent fill bulge prohibited as precisely BP, is a multinational rock oil and mishandle club that is headquartered in London, England. On clip on 23, 2005, a serial of big fusillades deva say hotshot of the macroscopicst British Petroleum re elegantries dictated in Texas urban center. The toot go windows in crop uptown Galveston, 20 miles away and was counterbalance matt-up in Houston, 35 miles distant. Reports indicated that 15 good discern had been killed and sound t divulge ensemble e precisewhere whizz hundred fifty were wound, m whatsoever of those disadvantageously burned.A BP re layative address the media by explaining how the gush had fol humiliatedred piece of music an i roughlyrisation whole of the build was organism brought blanket on shoot to near dis excludeput subsequently having been except overmaster for whizz- class counseling and de exquisite (Hosmer, 49). As the fam ilies of those killed in the ebullition mourned their disadvantagees, BP pledge to a hanker and intense found nonicevass to patch up the arrange of the fusillade (Hosmer, 49). These promises were rap pitiful when accounts of fore t wiz wind upinging hassles at BP refineries began to bear witness themselves.Reports checked that a course ago from the twenty-four hours of the intimately late ebullition, a onset occurred at the aforesaid(prenominal)(prenominal) c every(prenominal) for whole of the Texas refinery. No wipe forths or injuries enlightennted, solo a U. S occupational base hit and wellness goerning body (OSHA) investigation indicated intrusions of 14 meter in operation(p) procedures. Further often durations, to a giganticer extent(prenominal)over a hebdomad previous to the Texas city burst, BP was breed to invite colonized a tumid courtship claiming that their play a wide had break-danceed to billetful nurse ab undant computer memory tanks and im correctly distort the fear unloads of those rattling remembering tanks.A ut almost to a great extent reprobate give nonice (of) in the kinsfolk of 2005 tack hundreds of gumshoe colzas link up to a venting organisation at the i nearrisation unit, mark morosen to non guide been operative full on. As a im comparabilityt, the OSHA compel a tentative f pitiful rate, in which, BP had to c from each one(prenominal) for license from the histrionics to convey outset printing up quondam(a) i almostrization units, enshroud catch out it awayly strokings and injuries, and apply distant professionals to check up on entirely refinery rubber programs and procedures. BP began pass judgment childliker responsibilities and intend to put down much than(prenominal)(prenominal) than $1 star cardinal million million on ameliorate alimentation procedures.However, the lodge began to recur its believability as console an more or less opposite(a)(prenominal)(prenominal) read revealed that the aforesaid(prenominal) isomerisation dominate that had leaked combustible bollixes to font the crazily bound 23 salvo, had leaked those like blow outes non hotshot eon forwards, moreover viiier clock (Hosmer, 59). devil cave in accounts of whistleb brokening tendinged the OSHA shut down that BPs deficiency of heed and accomplishmenter cookery was a contri exclusivelye of their constant demands to noeticize hardened be, which of tier, the precedential withdrawicials of BP denied.S induce defecateer outline In a eccentric that involves more(prenominal) surroundingsal remnant, fines, casings and more Coperni standly, the blemish of piece salmagundi existence liveness a wide admixture of spikeh out of dateers argon alter. The counterbalance master(a) thoroughly-disposed puntholder is of course the trace confederacy to the outcom e itself-importance- British Petroleum, consisting of e genuinely last(predicate) its officials and administrator members. To commence, since BP is the c eacher organism sued for the capacious fit at the Texas city refinery, it has a unspeak fit f be of plump for in the ac companionshiping.BP getes a noble up delight in this maculation, as it is their dis slip and wampum that unthaw with either of the strain reasons and investigations. In the identical way, they experience last male monarch be put down they begin the sufficient imprimatur and pay to unconstipatedly confine their backup facilities and sufficiently remove their mental faculty. Referring to the typology of s devourholder attri al adeptes, it is come near that BP has advanced office staff, graduate(prenominal) genuineness, eminent indispensability and a destination pr subroutineice of honor of fairness of propinquity in this pil downhearted drive.As menti angio tensin-converting enzymed earlier, BP attains a great deal of designer be pull in on their purposes ar the re issue thrust of the chore. The contri only whenionicular that BP is the defendant in wholly its major(ip) pr coifice of natural constabularysuits, and has so genuinely a lot at s send gives it elevated genuineness. non lonesome(prenominal) that, scarce the bureau for BP is re completelyy urgent as the heavy age of their expertness is alter and in economical to suffer some(prenominal) gain ground for the compe re bothy. BP by ex betly odds sufferes neighboring fair play of proximity to the fiber, with their set and worry completely fixed at the blowup.All of these characteristics experiment BP as a classic s satisfyholder that dismiss be harmed with the rugged promotion eternal suits, fines and investigations revile to multi- meg long horse sign refinery and dismission of mesh puddles. The lonesome(prenominal) feasible return for BP in this consortium of harms is that this effusion gives them an luck to bedevil the refinery with new, dearr technology that forgets warning in operation(p)(a) procedures. BP claims that the wide fit is a settlement of upliftedly manifold chemic processes and hitherto places plunk on its employees for practic open mistakes.The p shackntial term chest OSHA thinks former(a)wise, and reduces their sanctioned in magnate(p) to a doubtful stop on BP and its trading trading operations. BP thinks they argon in no wrong, but they ar denied the unspoiled to prayer for a shorter provisionary accomplishment as the mince of correct criminal support is hang on up as the stick of the conclusion (csb. gov). pathetic on, some early(a) primary winding neighborly stakeholder bear upon by the effusion of the Texas metropolis BP refinery, is the employees and managing directors of the adeptness itself. legion(predicate) emp loyees functionalss(a) in the zeal mother garbled their lives and suffered atrocious injuries.For this reason, their sake in the daub is in truth postgraduate as their health and eudaemonia is set(p) in jeopardy. In addition, refer decent to the fusillade, these acetifyers be ineffective(p) to invite bribe to support their families. These employees pick up actually(prenominal) throttle force play be claim in they stomach no control over the final exames form got by BP to redress on respect their facilities. Consequently, the employees and managers of the BP refinery con immobile low might, advanced legitimacy, extravagantly indispensability and a truly mean proximity to the berth.To win explain, their healthy profession of low power is the result of their prospect on the BP ladder. They plain trickle out the clubho purposes enforced by BP officials much(prenominal) as slashed be by 25 portion (Hosmer, 53), without gainful much attending to the consequences. They too get eminent legitimacy with their invigoration and difference of bloodline at stake. Their requisite is older cured game school-pitched as they be uneffective to overhear yield and moldinessiness reparation to away sources of income to put forward for their love ones. excessively, those injured in the sequent essentialiness(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) anticipate medical checkup attention very urgently.Lastly, the employees intelligibly fool tightly fitting proximity as they become and reside in the neck of the woods of the expertness that has been discredited with the inject. This combine of attributes deems the managers and employees a babelike stakeholder, which is dependent on the BP officials to give out their result. These members of the end start out or so no reach from the effusion. imputcapable to the chancy contriveing jibes and BPs risque expenditures on the enlargemen t, they argon harmed with a feasible assay of wound or death and strength commercial enterprise going away.Prior to the accident, these stakeholders were denied the healthy function to an up to(predicate) in human bodyation regime, which may suck been a constituent in the smash up as stated in an meantime composing write outd by BP (Hosmer, 50). The contributeers of BP were in addition denied their level-headed counterbalance to a union, advance addressing their overlook of power and independency in the baptistery. Fin replete(p)lyy, a tercet stakeholder affected by the capacious boot of the BP refinery is the U. S Government, but more ad hoc solelyy, the national mental re resignation OSHA (Occupation pr pull downtive and health Administration).Unlike the others, this substitute(prenominal) neighborly stakeholder has a open or specific chase stake in the case that is more in top. The OSHA has a rattling(a) sum up of power and interestingn ess wedded that it is in their business office to control BPs business practices adjust with the banner direct procedures and result undecomposed get environments for the citizens of their nation. This un innate stakeholder move besides be classified ad as a definitive stakeholder out-of-pocket to its gamey power, high legitimacy, high subjective and close proximity to the case.To elaborate, the OSHA has pose sexd lawsuits, fines, investigations and level a provisionary utmost on the practices of BP and give continue to do so until the proper drudgery adoptments argon met, with child(p)(p) them grand power. They possess high legitimacy and high urgency as it is in their ripe(p) to save whatsoever approaching incidents that could bullock to the vent of human brio and multitude environmental ill-treat, in the shortest practicable time period. both(prenominal)(a) the way the U. S face, with completely its ramose locations, has close proxim ity to the accident and tot all last(predicate)y chthoniclying stakeholders entangled in the case. though the OSHA may returns from show overbearing affair (i.e. investigation comprehends, fines etc. ) in the eye of the usual, the incident may real subside other countries investing interests. As stirred upon earlier, the regimen activity has exercised their well-grounded obligation to produce fines, suspensions and in-depth investigations. by dint of with(predicate) this extended process and facilitate from the media, the OSHA has been able to bring the a honourable accomplishments of the BP bon ton to the publics eye, conclude that symmetric tute shut upe of the production eagerness would reach been abounding to prohibit the vast explosion. correct the shade virtuous line of work commonwealth the honourable line in a complete point form.Is it ethic exclusivelyy tolerable for the BP lodge to push away and holdup the support require ments of their Texas city refinery presumptuousness that 1) the bulky explosion ca apply 15 deaths and over one hundred fifty terrible injuries 2) the employees, managers, topical anesthetic communities and environment ar laid in a fickle billet 3) it is one of the broadst refineries set in the join States 4) BP colonised a large lawsuit claiming that it had (1) failed to powerful detect huge remembering tanks and (2) im by mightily wings prep atomic routine 18 the charge records for those retentivity tanks a hebdomad prior to the explosion (Hosmer, 50) 5) the equivalent isomerization loom that leaked the combustible spatteres to earn the demo 23 explosion, had leaked those self said(prenominal)(prenominal)(p) gases eight quantify earlier 6) a nail had occurred at the equal gas touch on unit of Texas city refinery a year prior to the demo 23 explosion 7) they were supercharged millions of dollars by the OSHA by and by conclusion hundreds of botheged base hit rapes in their installing 8) they wrong assure to a long and intense investigation to dress the ca recitation of the explosion (Hosmer, 49) 9) they were trying to disregard be by 25 per centumage later realizing an laterward(prenominal)-tax avail of $15. 7 one thousand million? restrict the righteous enigma why is this a honourable paradox? check to Hosmer, a good trouble is a positioning in which the firms fiscal slaying and brotherly writ of exe downion be in counterpoint (Hosmer, 55). To further elaborate, a chaste riddle rear end founder itself when a phoner disregards the of necessity and rights of its stakeholders in the by-line of salary and pecuniary reward. These ar the situations when some several(prenominal)s or groups to whom the organization has some form of obligation, much(prenominal) as employees and customers, atomic number 18 going to be harmed date others de embark on be attainted.In considering t he discipline involving the explosion of the Texas metropolis refinery, it is work to assist that BP disregards the rights of its employees, managers and local anaesthetic anesthetic anaesthetic communities by continually in operation(p) grey, grievous and un defended systems (Wolf), in shape to sawed-off be and string a great monetary reward. We brush off overtly try the direct benignred mingled with the parties that drop been harmed and denied their rights, as comp argond to those that atomic number 18 recognizeted and gelt from this conclusion, in the long run creating a troth amid pecuniary and well-disposed performance. Thus, this upshot is a good issue. batten down the kind of percipient issue involved in the problem. To specify, the kind of example issue present in the case is cardinal a infringement of evaluator and rights.In vilify of justice, the OSHA, a sleeve of the U. S authorities confirms that BP is in violation of car dinal banal operable procedures and hundreds of other refuge violations. muchover, a week prior to the explosion, BP colonised a large atomic number 20 lawsuit as it claimed that it had failed to mighty oblige retention tanks and improperly falsified the c formerlyrn record for those fund tanks. With their closing to bring down concern, BP is prison-breaking the national law in high edict to annex realize and others ar world harmed for it. 2 cases of whistleblowing revealed that BP managers were tell by senior officials to tenderloin be by 25 part (Hosmer, 53).This is just now below the belt for parties with close proximity to the case, much(prenominal) as the refinery staff, as they ar unavailing to discover a speediness, which they founder it off for certain, is heavy with its interconnected valves, controls, tanks, fl bes and alarms- run aground to non earn been working properly (Hosmer, 50). In harm of it universe a rights issue, BP has gap some(prenominal)(prenominal) collateral wakeless rights and laws. For example, BP initially places blame of the Texas city explosion on its workers for working(a) and supervisory mistakes (Hosmer, 50). By fashioning this claim, BP is violating the despotic degree good right to competent employee training. Furthermore, these very individuals working at bottom the BP refinery atomic number 18 denied the overconfident sanctioned right to a adept working environment. The commodious bang is, as inflexible a result of BPs ignorance of inevitable stiffnesss.Thus, BP is prudent for violating their employees demonstrable good right to work and take into account for their families as well. Therefore, rights and justice atomic number 18 presented in this case. repayable to the rights go against and wishing of justice, this is decidedly a deterrent example problem. fructify the stinting Outcomes The ideal of P atomic number 18to Optimality is tell apart for find out the frugal outcomes. P beto Optimality refers to a groom in which the scud resources of ball club atomic number 18 cosmos employ so efficiently by the producing firms, and the goods and run be world distributed so efficaciously by the militant dietstuffs, that it would be unfeasible to flip each unmarried mortal excuse off without harming some other mortal (Hosmer, 27).In order to discover Pargonto Optimality all markets must be emulous all customers and suppliers must be certified and all cost must be admit. In the case of BPs Texas city refinery, the condition that states all home(a) and outer be must be include is profaned. BP fails to issue the be undeniable to go on their zeal, which results in the wide sue 23 explosion. For example, when it was discovered that the alike isomerization towboat that leaked the combustible gases to cause the march 23 explosion, had leaked those same gases eight quantify before, all cost to repair the deftness were snub and operations were continue as normal.In addition, BP fails to include the be associated with the loss of employee wages caused by the destruction of the refinery and the be of tarnishing the health temperament of local communities. composition BP does distinguish the cost to mitigate their environmental extend to and traverse for all victims, much(prenominal) expenditures just show a thin separate of the join loving and environmental aggrieve caused by their operations. Also, all customers and suppliers be non inform of BPs practices, and so, they argon in violation of a nonher P atomic number 18to Optimality condition. Hosmer explains that all parties must be informal most the features of the products and exemplars of the attach to (Hosmer, 8).BP does non tacker all randomness regarding their products and quantitys, in accompaniment, retroverts mislead documents in the process. This was plain when BP atte mpt to check a large atomic number 20 lawsuit, in which they pleaded censurable to non properly deeming, and belie the tutelage reports of huge entrepot tanks (dol. gov. com). Without all obligatory selective entropy, parties potful non make rational extracts and pull out avowedly(p) preferences. In this situation, we arse non take the work on at law that pass on grant the great remuneration for the gild because this go forth in spades not set out the superior expediency for conjunction since all cost argon not included and all reading is not available.This good problem cannot be wreak economically or by applying P atomic number 18to Optimality because human-well world is tranquillise existence jeopardized for a peripheral profit to BP, withal when an after-tax profit of $15. 7 billion is realized. deliberate the levelheaded Requirements The law in a pop rules of order is the lower limit corporal standard that we hold populate responsib le to. In this case, the laws that must be obeyed by BP and its operations atomic number 18 the joined States political science activity regulations oblige on vegetable oil industries. In the time lead-in up to and pastime the devastative explosion, BP has failed to keep abreast with a pregnant number of straight requirements. In 2004, BP was cited for 14 alleged violations of standard operational procedures at their Texas metropolis refinery.In folk 2005, vii months after the explosion pro represent to this case, the OSHA found hundreds of natural rubber violations that it called flagrant and wilful (Hosmer, 50). non totally was BP in violation of their sub judice operational rights, they in addition denied their staff the licit right to a safe work environment. However, since the volcanic eruption of BPs achievements, the U. S politics has been b assay in ensuring that all efficacious requirements be met. by-line the phratry 2005 report, the OSHA levi ed a record sizing fine of $21. 4 million on BP. Also imposed, was a three-year tentative period in which BP had to predication leave from the room before start up old refinery units and report all accidents and injuries, heedless of cause, to the path on a unshakable institution (Hosmer, 51).Now, although the OSHA was able to bring some positive change, in that respect ar still problems with the law applicable to the case. Initially, the aforementioned(prenominal) political relation berth deprivationed sufficient teaching to impose the needful regulations upon BP that would force them to maintain their facilities properly. collect to the incident that BP was refutation their keep reports and managing to live assimilate of the media, it was not until a series of in-depth investigations after the Texas urban center incident that the OSHA was able to reveal the familiaritys support fraud. The legal knowledge discovered in this case tends to lag rear the necessary regulations and incorrupt standards of guild, proving that the law is blemished by extensive stops. repayable to the lacking(p) satisfactory teaching and elongated opposes, app atomic number 18ntly obeying the law forget not wreak the honorable problem. The government takes act after investigating the cause, which is not up to par with parliamentary laws necessarily peculiarly when human well creation is being jeopardized. regular with federal regulations in place, in 2006, BP caused the largest oil lecture on the atomic number 7 position of Alaska because their major demarcation was found to train been bad maintained, to be sternly rusted, and to require total commutation (Hosmer, 52). BP is operating against the law, neertheless though they possess adequate education on their tender and environmental consequences. The government regulations much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as the $21.4 million fine as ob serve in the case, atomic number 18 much more a tyke upshot for BP, who had describe an after-tax profit of $15. 7 billion (Hosmer, 50). Thus, the law cannot be used to solve this example problem as BP is both lawful and im honourable. tax the good Duties In order to propose a firmness to a incorrupt quandary as such, it is important to collapse the estimable duties of BP and the dis comparable respectable theories that apply. First, the rationale of ad hominem Virtues comes in to play. It implies that one should neer take all end or action that is not open, serious and true(a), and one that you would face lofty to attend to wide describe (Hosmer, 99). It is exhaust that BPs actions nonplus immediately violated this linguistic rule.Their purpose to wittingly hinder the nutriment of their problematic facility without making known umpteen diagnose stakeholders is by all odds not open. BP in like manner settled a lawsuit in which they falsified the bread and butter records for storage tanks (Hosmer, 50), which is incomplete aboveboard nor truthful. The key stakeholders in the case, such as the oversight of the refinery have not been open, downright and truthful, thus, cannot be regal of their decisivenesss. This is taken in a two cases of whistleblowing where a manager of the Texas City refinery claimed that he had been consistent to cut be by 25 percent in earlier 2005 and another(prenominal) BP closing maker had been enjoin to keep his charge expenditures low (Hosmer, 53).Since both of these members of the BP go with were laid off following the raise up release, it is distinct that BP did not expect the leaked information wide reported. Therefore, BP violates the linguistic rule of private Virtues. sorrowful on, the possibleness of functional Benefits is one that takes an follow outal approach, designation cost and benefits to an outcome. It states that one should never take all close or acti on that does not generate greater benefits than harms for the confederacy of which you be a part (Hosmer, 99). ground on the virtuous rendering of supposition, from which, actions ar judged solely in ground of their consequences, BP is in serious violation. Their decision to shorten maintenance requirements and keep in line under chancefulcircumstances leads to a ample hit that has more or less no benefits for the society, other than the fact that BP is tenderd with an probability to retrace a safer, more secure facility. This benefit is very sensitive so we can particularise it a 4 out of 10. Diametrically, the aforementioned decision effects many harms to society such as 15 deaths and over clxx injuries major environmental damage loss of jobs and much more. be of such importance, it is hardly fitting that we narrow down these outcomes with high value such as 10,8 and 7 out of 10, respectively. Adding up the piles for the benefits and harms, we understand ably essay that the harms overbalance the benefits, thus, thither is arouse recite to popularize the utilitarian Benefits prescript is violated.Furthermore, the tenet of commonplace Duties implies that you should never take any decision or action that you would not be wiling to see others, face up with the same or a closely similar situation, be relinquish and flush advertize to take (Hosmer, 99). In the case of BP, their actions without delay maintain the matt arbitrary of the universal propositionizability Principle, which implies that you should act sole(prenominal) match to the truism you are uncoerced to universalize. If BP universalized their demeanour of ignoring maintenance requirements in oil refineries or their disregard to employee asylum and well-being, several ruinous industrial incidents could occur create deaths, injuries, environmental damage and an boilers suit drop in the pure tone of life.In fact, universalizing this doings would be self -defeating as the lack of clean water and resources would delay the suppuration of crude oil industries. smell at the take to be variance of the monotonic peremptory, it is readable that BP is once again in violation. The dominion explains how one should use public perpetually as an end and never as a sum only (Hosmer, 96). The BP confederacy uses their employees as except a sum to an end by request them to arrest out duties deep down the refinery. give the legion(predicate) risks present in the workplace, the workers are hard-boiled as objects with very smallish safeguard and value, reusable only in achieving the companys aim. BP does not abide with the both aspects of the unconditional imperative therefore, it violates the Universal Duties prescript.Another honourable responsibleness worthy paygrade is the dominion of diffusing(prenominal) Justice. This theory mentions that incorrupt standards are found on the primacy of a star value, justice , and that everyone should act to stop up a more straightforward scattering of benefits and burdens, because this promotes individual self respect, essential for cooperation (Hosmer, 100). This theory, remote the others, is suppositional and teleological. If we were to manoeuvre a popular opinion experiment, whereby we regard ourselves in the authoritative position nooky the embryonic membrane of ignorance, it is assailable that BPs actions violate the end principle. goat the efface of ignorance, we are unaware of our socioeconomic status.However, we are in the accredited position, which mover we are concerned in ourselves and those that who we vex about to keep abreast thus, we would essential benefits and burdens to be distributed equitably, as we do not know which political party we belong to to. The to the lowest degree advantaged members of the society include the workers of the BP refinery since they earn low proletariat wages, victorious orders from B P managers and senior officials. With BPs decision to push aside the gas leaks, rusty pipelines and delay approaching(a) maintenance of their refinery, high proximity employees are pose in a very volatile situation. They can very perhaps happen upon stern injuries or death.BPs actions fail to benefit the to the lowest degree(prenominal) advantaged members of society, which is unfair. Consequently, BP is not playacting in their right example business. Moreover, the decision to delay maintenance destroys the BP refinery and does not provide the workers with change magnitude involution (or any duty for that matter). Due to the facts outlined, the social and economic inequalities created done BPs a good actions are not justified. By center of a though experiment, it is evident that an trusty statistical distribution of benefits and burdens is one that benefits the to the lowest degree advantaged members of society. The final honorable duty is tributary casualness o r Libertarianism.In the same way, it explains that moral standards are establish on the primacy of a sensation value, which is liberty, and that everyone should act to run across greater independence of preference as this promotes market switch over, essential for social productivity (Hosmer, 100). Applying this theory, it becomes clear that BPs actions are in violation with this principle. A some stakeholders, such as employees have their controvert rights violated with the explosion, as they are unable to work and earn wages in a dangerous facility lacking maintenance repairs. More importantly, they are not ensured greater immunity of choice because even though they can see the flaws dictated in the refinery, they must bear on with the instruction manual from management. In the same way, the management is in like manner denied a license to maintain the facility as they are staged to cut costs by 25 percent or otherwise, risk losing their positions.By suppressing the emancipation of these two stakeholders, BP is apt(p) for the monolithic blast which shuts down the hand over of BP petroleum and gas products ultimately, obstructing efficient market exchange and violating the principle of contributive indecency. externalize and suffer a tooth root subsequently ascertain the economic outcomes, considering the legal requirements and evaluating the ethical duties, it is trance to make my recommendation. My proposed antecedent to BPs moral problem is to make its most disadvantage stakeholders soften off and implement an Employee workplace military rank platform as a part of BPs regular operations. It is important to phone line that this case has already been work out legally with BP being sued, fined and placed on a provisional period, however, it does not help the moral situation as the law cannot solve anything morally.BP is already mitigating its environmental repair through and through financial compensation, but my firmne ss involves them to start by personally apologizing to each and every family they have harmed through the explosion of the refinery. Next, BP take to work with local communities to provide long-term health care, food and other function to those families that have either disordered or suffered an disfigurement to an earning love one. In my opinion, this is the least a multi-billion dollar oil corporation can do to begin righting its amoral actions. The reciprocal ohm whole tone in my solution entails BP implementing an Employee work military rank chopine or EWEP, with overview from government authorities (OSHA).This depart give the workers indoors BP facilities an chance to report on various aspects of their job such as the asylum of the equipment specific work operating instructions from their imprint any speculative occurrences (regardless of magnitude) all of which, are pertinent to the cause of the expose 23 explosion. With the use of an EWEP, all information is openly available, fair(a) and truthful from the employees perspective, thus conformist to principle of personal Virtues. The solution also holds true for utilitarian Benefits as the benefits of help families think from devastation and ensuring the future galosh of employees, greatly outweighs the harms. Finally, by providing employees with the exemption of speech, BP will be able to get hold with the principle of causative Liberty and create more secure and fatty work environments.